cd45 2 Search Results


cd45 2 miltenyi biotec  (Miltenyi Biotec)
94
Miltenyi Biotec cd45 2 miltenyi biotec
Cd45 2 Miltenyi Biotec, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+2/CD45%2E2+Antibody%2C+anti-mouse/pm32234475-208-25-26
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd45 2 miltenyi biotec - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cd4  (Cytek Biosciences)
93
Cytek Biosciences cd4
Cd4, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+2/violetFluor+450+Anti-Mouse+CD45%2E2/pmc11002095-81-42-50
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
form bioxcell  (Bio X Cell)
93
Bio X Cell form bioxcell
Form Bioxcell, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+2/InVivoMAb+anti-mouse+CD45%2E2/pmc12629203-245-3-4
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
form bioxcell - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cd45 2 percp cy5 5  (Cytek Biosciences)
92
Cytek Biosciences cd45 2 percp cy5 5
Cd45 2 Percp Cy5 5, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+2/PerCP-Cyanine5%2E5+Anti-Mouse+CD45%2E2/pmc05094194-79-12-10
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd45 2 percp cy5 5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cd45 2 pe cy7  (Cytek Biosciences)
93
Cytek Biosciences cd45 2 pe cy7
Cd45 2 Pe Cy7, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+2/PE-Cyanine7+Anti-Mouse+CD45%2E2/pmc09012449-32-0-5
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd45 2 pe cy7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
anti cd45 2 pe antibody  (Miltenyi Biotec)
94
Miltenyi Biotec anti cd45 2 pe antibody
Anti Cd45 2 Pe Antibody, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+2/CD45%2E2+Antibody%2C+anti-mouse%2C+REAfinity/pmc10076352-238-16-20
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd45 2 pe antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
anti mouse cd45 2  (Cytek Biosciences)
92
Cytek Biosciences anti mouse cd45 2
a , Schema for generating ML memory CD8 + T cells. Naive mice were infected with VSV generating antigen-specific memory CD8 + T cells. Heterologous VSV infection and boosting of the memory T cells was performed after 30 versus 60 days post previous infection. After three infections, the antigen-specific memory CD8 + T cells were transferred into congenically distinct naive mice, and the boosting strategy was repeated over a time frame that yielded memory T cells with age ranging between 0.5 and ~4 mouse lifetime (LT) equivalents. For young memory, n = 6; 0.5× LT, n = 3; 2–3× LT, n = 5; and 4× LT, n = 3. b , Representative FACS analysis of cell trace violet (CTV) dilution from 3° <t>(CD45.2)</t> and 51° (CD45.1) memory T cells transferred into recipient CD45.1/2 mice. CTV label was measured 10 days after VSV-Indiana challenge of the chimeric mice. c , PCA plot of 3,000 most variable CpG sites comparing ML and ‘young’ memory T cells. Plot showing principal components 1 and 2 (PC1 and PC2). d , Violin plots showing average genome-wide CpG methylation for naive, young memory and ML CD8 + T cells. The red triangles represent the median values. e , Heatmap showing top ML gain of methylation DMRs. f , GSEA using cell cycle regulators and gain versus loss of methylation DMRs for 4× LT memory CD8 + T cells relative to young memory CD8 + T cells. The P value is based on the weighted Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic with no adjustment. g , Genomic and CpG island annotation of top loss and gain of methylation ML DMRs. h , Summary graph showing mean methylation across top ML gain of methylation DMRs relative to boosting and age of memory T cells. Different lengths of resting period also result in significant changes of mean methylation levels. The P value is based on the two-sided Student’s t -test.
Anti Mouse Cd45 2, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+2/Purified+Anti-Mouse+CD45%2E2/pmc11333289-181-19-25
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse cd45 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
anti mouse cd45 2 antibodies  (fluidigm)
93
fluidigm anti mouse cd45 2 antibodies
a , Schema for generating ML memory CD8 + T cells. Naive mice were infected with VSV generating antigen-specific memory CD8 + T cells. Heterologous VSV infection and boosting of the memory T cells was performed after 30 versus 60 days post previous infection. After three infections, the antigen-specific memory CD8 + T cells were transferred into congenically distinct naive mice, and the boosting strategy was repeated over a time frame that yielded memory T cells with age ranging between 0.5 and ~4 mouse lifetime (LT) equivalents. For young memory, n = 6; 0.5× LT, n = 3; 2–3× LT, n = 5; and 4× LT, n = 3. b , Representative FACS analysis of cell trace violet (CTV) dilution from 3° <t>(CD45.2)</t> and 51° (CD45.1) memory T cells transferred into recipient CD45.1/2 mice. CTV label was measured 10 days after VSV-Indiana challenge of the chimeric mice. c , PCA plot of 3,000 most variable CpG sites comparing ML and ‘young’ memory T cells. Plot showing principal components 1 and 2 (PC1 and PC2). d , Violin plots showing average genome-wide CpG methylation for naive, young memory and ML CD8 + T cells. The red triangles represent the median values. e , Heatmap showing top ML gain of methylation DMRs. f , GSEA using cell cycle regulators and gain versus loss of methylation DMRs for 4× LT memory CD8 + T cells relative to young memory CD8 + T cells. The P value is based on the weighted Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic with no adjustment. g , Genomic and CpG island annotation of top loss and gain of methylation ML DMRs. h , Summary graph showing mean methylation across top ML gain of methylation DMRs relative to boosting and age of memory T cells. Different lengths of resting period also result in significant changes of mean methylation levels. The P value is based on the two-sided Student’s t -test.
Anti Mouse Cd45 2 Antibodies, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+2/Anti-Mouse+CD45%2E2+(104)-147Sm/ppr0544575-196-14-27
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse cd45 2 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
anti cd45 2  (Rockland Immunochemicals)
88
Rockland Immunochemicals anti cd45 2
a , Schema for generating ML memory CD8 + T cells. Naive mice were infected with VSV generating antigen-specific memory CD8 + T cells. Heterologous VSV infection and boosting of the memory T cells was performed after 30 versus 60 days post previous infection. After three infections, the antigen-specific memory CD8 + T cells were transferred into congenically distinct naive mice, and the boosting strategy was repeated over a time frame that yielded memory T cells with age ranging between 0.5 and ~4 mouse lifetime (LT) equivalents. For young memory, n = 6; 0.5× LT, n = 3; 2–3× LT, n = 5; and 4× LT, n = 3. b , Representative FACS analysis of cell trace violet (CTV) dilution from 3° <t>(CD45.2)</t> and 51° (CD45.1) memory T cells transferred into recipient CD45.1/2 mice. CTV label was measured 10 days after VSV-Indiana challenge of the chimeric mice. c , PCA plot of 3,000 most variable CpG sites comparing ML and ‘young’ memory T cells. Plot showing principal components 1 and 2 (PC1 and PC2). d , Violin plots showing average genome-wide CpG methylation for naive, young memory and ML CD8 + T cells. The red triangles represent the median values. e , Heatmap showing top ML gain of methylation DMRs. f , GSEA using cell cycle regulators and gain versus loss of methylation DMRs for 4× LT memory CD8 + T cells relative to young memory CD8 + T cells. The P value is based on the weighted Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic with no adjustment. g , Genomic and CpG island annotation of top loss and gain of methylation ML DMRs. h , Summary graph showing mean methylation across top ML gain of methylation DMRs relative to boosting and age of memory T cells. Different lengths of resting period also result in significant changes of mean methylation levels. The P value is based on the two-sided Student’s t -test.
Anti Cd45 2, supplied by Rockland Immunochemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+2/ANTI-CD45%2E2+(MOUSE)+PHYCOERYTHRIN+CONJUG/pmc05818514-307-17-18
Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd45 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
88/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cd45 2 monoclonal mouse fitc  (Rockland Immunochemicals)
88
Rockland Immunochemicals cd45 2 monoclonal mouse fitc
a , Schema for generating ML memory CD8 + T cells. Naive mice were infected with VSV generating antigen-specific memory CD8 + T cells. Heterologous VSV infection and boosting of the memory T cells was performed after 30 versus 60 days post previous infection. After three infections, the antigen-specific memory CD8 + T cells were transferred into congenically distinct naive mice, and the boosting strategy was repeated over a time frame that yielded memory T cells with age ranging between 0.5 and ~4 mouse lifetime (LT) equivalents. For young memory, n = 6; 0.5× LT, n = 3; 2–3× LT, n = 5; and 4× LT, n = 3. b , Representative FACS analysis of cell trace violet (CTV) dilution from 3° <t>(CD45.2)</t> and 51° (CD45.1) memory T cells transferred into recipient CD45.1/2 mice. CTV label was measured 10 days after VSV-Indiana challenge of the chimeric mice. c , PCA plot of 3,000 most variable CpG sites comparing ML and ‘young’ memory T cells. Plot showing principal components 1 and 2 (PC1 and PC2). d , Violin plots showing average genome-wide CpG methylation for naive, young memory and ML CD8 + T cells. The red triangles represent the median values. e , Heatmap showing top ML gain of methylation DMRs. f , GSEA using cell cycle regulators and gain versus loss of methylation DMRs for 4× LT memory CD8 + T cells relative to young memory CD8 + T cells. The P value is based on the weighted Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic with no adjustment. g , Genomic and CpG island annotation of top loss and gain of methylation ML DMRs. h , Summary graph showing mean methylation across top ML gain of methylation DMRs relative to boosting and age of memory T cells. Different lengths of resting period also result in significant changes of mean methylation levels. The P value is based on the two-sided Student’s t -test.
Cd45 2 Monoclonal Mouse Fitc, supplied by Rockland Immunochemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+2/ANTI-CD45%2E2+(MOUSE)+FLUORESCEIN+CONJUG/pmc05818514-307-13-18
Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd45 2 monoclonal mouse fitc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
88/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
leukocyte common antigen  (OriGene)
90
OriGene leukocyte common antigen
a , Schema for generating ML memory CD8 + T cells. Naive mice were infected with VSV generating antigen-specific memory CD8 + T cells. Heterologous VSV infection and boosting of the memory T cells was performed after 30 versus 60 days post previous infection. After three infections, the antigen-specific memory CD8 + T cells were transferred into congenically distinct naive mice, and the boosting strategy was repeated over a time frame that yielded memory T cells with age ranging between 0.5 and ~4 mouse lifetime (LT) equivalents. For young memory, n = 6; 0.5× LT, n = 3; 2–3× LT, n = 5; and 4× LT, n = 3. b , Representative FACS analysis of cell trace violet (CTV) dilution from 3° <t>(CD45.2)</t> and 51° (CD45.1) memory T cells transferred into recipient CD45.1/2 mice. CTV label was measured 10 days after VSV-Indiana challenge of the chimeric mice. c , PCA plot of 3,000 most variable CpG sites comparing ML and ‘young’ memory T cells. Plot showing principal components 1 and 2 (PC1 and PC2). d , Violin plots showing average genome-wide CpG methylation for naive, young memory and ML CD8 + T cells. The red triangles represent the median values. e , Heatmap showing top ML gain of methylation DMRs. f , GSEA using cell cycle regulators and gain versus loss of methylation DMRs for 4× LT memory CD8 + T cells relative to young memory CD8 + T cells. The P value is based on the weighted Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic with no adjustment. g , Genomic and CpG island annotation of top loss and gain of methylation ML DMRs. h , Summary graph showing mean methylation across top ML gain of methylation DMRs relative to boosting and age of memory T cells. Different lengths of resting period also result in significant changes of mean methylation levels. The P value is based on the two-sided Student’s t -test.
Leukocyte Common Antigen, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+2/CD45+%2F+LCA+(CD45%2E2+alloantigen)+Mouse+Monoclonal+Antibody/pm20713416-72-27-34
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
leukocyte common antigen - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a , Schema for generating ML memory CD8 + T cells. Naive mice were infected with VSV generating antigen-specific memory CD8 + T cells. Heterologous VSV infection and boosting of the memory T cells was performed after 30 versus 60 days post previous infection. After three infections, the antigen-specific memory CD8 + T cells were transferred into congenically distinct naive mice, and the boosting strategy was repeated over a time frame that yielded memory T cells with age ranging between 0.5 and ~4 mouse lifetime (LT) equivalents. For young memory, n = 6; 0.5× LT, n = 3; 2–3× LT, n = 5; and 4× LT, n = 3. b , Representative FACS analysis of cell trace violet (CTV) dilution from 3° (CD45.2) and 51° (CD45.1) memory T cells transferred into recipient CD45.1/2 mice. CTV label was measured 10 days after VSV-Indiana challenge of the chimeric mice. c , PCA plot of 3,000 most variable CpG sites comparing ML and ‘young’ memory T cells. Plot showing principal components 1 and 2 (PC1 and PC2). d , Violin plots showing average genome-wide CpG methylation for naive, young memory and ML CD8 + T cells. The red triangles represent the median values. e , Heatmap showing top ML gain of methylation DMRs. f , GSEA using cell cycle regulators and gain versus loss of methylation DMRs for 4× LT memory CD8 + T cells relative to young memory CD8 + T cells. The P value is based on the weighted Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic with no adjustment. g , Genomic and CpG island annotation of top loss and gain of methylation ML DMRs. h , Summary graph showing mean methylation across top ML gain of methylation DMRs relative to boosting and age of memory T cells. Different lengths of resting period also result in significant changes of mean methylation levels. The P value is based on the two-sided Student’s t -test.

Journal: Nature Aging

Article Title: Conserved epigenetic hallmarks of T cell aging during immunity and malignancy

doi: 10.1038/s43587-024-00649-5

Figure Lengend Snippet: a , Schema for generating ML memory CD8 + T cells. Naive mice were infected with VSV generating antigen-specific memory CD8 + T cells. Heterologous VSV infection and boosting of the memory T cells was performed after 30 versus 60 days post previous infection. After three infections, the antigen-specific memory CD8 + T cells were transferred into congenically distinct naive mice, and the boosting strategy was repeated over a time frame that yielded memory T cells with age ranging between 0.5 and ~4 mouse lifetime (LT) equivalents. For young memory, n = 6; 0.5× LT, n = 3; 2–3× LT, n = 5; and 4× LT, n = 3. b , Representative FACS analysis of cell trace violet (CTV) dilution from 3° (CD45.2) and 51° (CD45.1) memory T cells transferred into recipient CD45.1/2 mice. CTV label was measured 10 days after VSV-Indiana challenge of the chimeric mice. c , PCA plot of 3,000 most variable CpG sites comparing ML and ‘young’ memory T cells. Plot showing principal components 1 and 2 (PC1 and PC2). d , Violin plots showing average genome-wide CpG methylation for naive, young memory and ML CD8 + T cells. The red triangles represent the median values. e , Heatmap showing top ML gain of methylation DMRs. f , GSEA using cell cycle regulators and gain versus loss of methylation DMRs for 4× LT memory CD8 + T cells relative to young memory CD8 + T cells. The P value is based on the weighted Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic with no adjustment. g , Genomic and CpG island annotation of top loss and gain of methylation ML DMRs. h , Summary graph showing mean methylation across top ML gain of methylation DMRs relative to boosting and age of memory T cells. Different lengths of resting period also result in significant changes of mean methylation levels. The P value is based on the two-sided Student’s t -test.

Article Snippet: The purified CD8 + T cells were then stained with anti-mouse CD8a (53-6.7) from BD Biosciences, anti-mouse CD45.1 (A20), anti-mouse CD45.2 (104), Ghost Dye from Tonbo Biosciences and N-Tetramer.

Techniques: Infection, Genome Wide, CpG Methylation Assay, Methylation